It comes as no surprise my trade secrets were given to Intergraph.
First of all, let me make this clear. I don’t give a care about the American Judicial “code of silence” that lawyers extend to judges because they’re afraid the judge will wreck their career. I am not a lawyer that has to go before a judge and fear I will lose my career if I speak out against the judge. Judges are appointed to uphold the laws, and anything else should cause them to be removed.
Any intimidation they impose on a lawyer should also cause them to be removed. Lawyers should be able to present their cases before a judge without fear of losing their license if they upset the judge. That’s part of litigation. Parties are going to be upset. That’s the way it is. Judges will be upset. Lawyers will be upset. Plaintiffs, Defendants and witnesses will be upset. Why should lawyers have to flirt with judges in order to keep their jobs, or to get favors from the judges?
I do not ever intend to become a lawyer, but if I did, I would risk my career to speak the truth. That is, I would stand boldly before a judge and challenge their wrongdoing even if it got me kicked out of the BAR. Therefore, why waste my money on law school to get into the BAR when I wouldn’t last long as a lawyer?
I see the BAR as a legal monopoly and a club for those who belong to it.
I was willing to lose millions of dollars in contracts just to stand for truth, so what makes a judge think I won’t risk a career as a lawyer to stand for truth?
If my speaking out is going to hurt my case and a judge decides to rule against me to make a point because I speak out on my blog, well, that’s only going to fuel me speaking out more and I will appeal until I’m blue in the face. If more Americans would speak out, we wouldn’t have judges overruling what “we the people” vote for on election days. But because we remain passive, our judges are making things up from the benches, and what we vote for in the polls means nothing to them.
I care about “we the people” and as far as I can tell, in America, we still have a voice and we still can write about our stories. Until a “gag order” is put on my experience in the judicial system, I fully intend to speak out. If it comes to that, then SLAPP will be next. If SLAPP fails then apparently, we have no Constitution.
I’m only voicing things that are already public and that I can back with written documents. Case in point, what the judge told me and how he handed over my trade secrets is in writing. And what did one of the lawyers say after I challenged this? “If I’m wrong, I’m wrong.” He was referring to me challenging them having access to the trade secrets and not knowing what was proprietary on the CD ROM. He said he will make his own decision on what Intergraph can use, and “If I’m wrong, I’m wrong.”
Justice is being hindered for certain small businesses at Robins Air Force Base. Intergraph was put in place by the government, for the government, in place of the government, and without a government person present when negotiating a contract with me.
Why is this okay? Why is the media silent? Why are the courts assisting Intergraph?
This happened during the 2003- 2005 BRAC session, where the media (The Macon Telegraph and 13WMAZ) blocked my story from being told because of BRAC. In fact, one of the reporters from 13WMAZ called me on my cell phone claiming she wanted to report my story. She immediately defended Intergraph (they have a spokesperson for BRAC issues on 13WMAZ) She didn’t report my story. She now works for the defendants and her picture is side by side with the Intergraph spokesperson.
Now we have started BRAC all over again, which is coming up in 2012. The same people are still in place at Robins AFB and the media that can destroy any justice for those of us who are seeking it.
They have the political clout and money to shut the mouths of the contractors at the base. They threaten to take away contracts. Well, that won’t work with me. I’ve already lost everything. The only thing they have left to take from me is my life, and if it’s that important to them to shut me up, then my blood will be on their heads.  I am not afraid to stand for justice, nor seek it.
I’m sick of the judicial secrecy and “flirting” between lawyers and judges. I’m sick of the words spoken that I’m not allowed to have evidence. Evidence that JAG knows will help my case if I’m allowed to have it.
Why would a judge tell me he won’t allow me to clean up Robins Air Force Base? Could it be part of that political involvement has to do with BRAC? Then right in front of me, the lawyers and the judge exchange my trade secrets, as if it’s nothing to them.
Can a complaint be filed against a judge (such as through the BAR), and can I subpoena records of a judge’s political involvement? What would the statute of limitations be on the judge handing over my discovery information for the financial gain of the defendants?
I’m making this a new mission. I want access to the judge’s political records and now my mission is to find out what rules a judge follows, and what their political connections are. When due process is denied and the specific denial given to me has to do with Robins Air Force Base, something is wrong.
Goals for this mission:
1. Find out what rules judges have to obey. I also want to find out how District Court judges get their jobs, and whether or not they receive support from special interest groups, businesses, lawyers or others who may have an interest in the outcome of cases. This also applies to a Superior Court judge who refused to allow me access to evidence I requested, and said the state court didn’t have the authority to order the government to turn over evidence. Which, in my humble pro se opinion, should not have resulted in summary judgments to the defendants, but rather, a dismissal of my case for lack of jurisdiction. That would have allowed me to add the causes of actions and defendants to my District Court case instead.
2. Find out what rules the judge disobeyed.
3. Find out what records I’m allowed to have (political involvement, complaints by other parties such as biased decisions, who donated to the judge’s campaigns or other causes, etc.)
4. Find out how to get the records
5. Get the records
6. Get justice
Why am I publishing my legal strategy? Because it’s no secret what happened in the District Court, which is public information. It’s no secret one of the judges is heavily involved in politics. And because I’m sick of the way the political BRAC crap is denying small businesses a chance at contracts and a chance at justice.
When a judge tells me he won’t allow me to clean up Robins Air Force Base, it makes me wonder why he supports the corruption.
And because BRAC is coming up again and I’m not going to let this get buried. It’s an election year in America. None of the candidates care about the small businesses. Why should they? Their PAC money comes from large corporations at Robins AFB and those teamed with the prime contractors, because they have been brainwashed into thinking that justice and contract favoritism is something you have to buy.
I will pursue due process to the end of this journey and I’m not going to offer anyone campaign money to get it. I won’t pay for justice. I expect it.










Message Wall RSS Feed